Serious games and educational simulations are an unique product category with functional requirements that are different from platform and casual games, MMOGs, and drill–n-skill learning games. The gameplay itself is only the tip of the iceberg: hidden out of sight is an engine the player doesn’t see.
As an emerging market, however, little has been written about the best engines for building serious games. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for publishers to choose development partners, and for developers to scope new projects. My article “Serious Game Engine Shootout: a comparative analysis of technology for serious game development” and panel discussion on March 6th at the Serious Games Summit is intended to help address this deficiency. For more on the topic visit my new Resources page.
Serious Game Engine Shootout: A Comparative Analysis of the Technology
by Richard on 23. Feb, 2007 in Games & Sims, Next Tech, The Biosphere
Tags: Ed Tech, Games & Sims, Next Tech, The Biosphere
4 Responses to “Serious Game Engine Shootout: A Comparative Analysis of the Technology”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
-
Richard Carey Associates > Digital Media Solutions, Serious Games & Learning Simulations -
15. Sep, 2007
[...] partnered on several MMOG research and development projects. Earlier this year I wrote a piece on serious game engines for CMP and this week Technology & Learning published Lee’s thorough article about Video [...]
-
Richard Carey > Digital Media Solutions, Serious Games & Learning Simulations -
21. Dec, 2007
[...] Serious Game Engine Shootout [...]
-
Best of 2007 at iFast -
11. Jan, 2008
[...] Serious Game Engine Shootout [...]
Leave a Reply
What We Do
Richard Carey Digital Media offers consulting, creative direction, product development and project management services for web and mobile apps, serious games and educational technologies.
What can we do for you? Find out more about our services or contact us today for a free consultation.


Nice article! I’d say that most decent game engines are good to go for serious game development. I think (even though I might be wrong) that the programmer is the one that can add “serious” behavior to almost any engine.